13:I[2754,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 14:I[8387,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 16:I[2972,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],""] 15:T6bb,

DeepSeek's Answers Include Chinese Propaganda, Researchers Say

A recent investigation by international researchers has uncovered potential propaganda bias in DeepSeek, a prominent Chinese artificial intelligence language model, highlighting growing concerns about AI neutrality and information integrity.

The study, conducted by a team of independent AI ethics researchers, found that DeepSeek's responses frequently align with Chinese government narratives, particularly regarding sensitive topics like territorial disputes, human rights, and geopolitical issues.

Key findings from the research include:

Systematic bias in responses about Taiwan, Tibet, and South China Sea territories
Tendency to present state-approved perspectives as objective facts
Subtle linguistic framing that reinforces official government positions

Experts warn that such AI models can subtly shape public perception by presenting biased information as neutral knowledge. Dr. Emily Chen, an AI ethics specialist, noted, "These language models aren't just translation tools—they're potential vectors for sophisticated information manipulation."

The revelations underscore the critical need for transparency and rigorous testing of AI systems, especially those developed in regions with strict information control. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into global communication, understanding and mitigating potential biases remains paramount.

DeepSeek has not yet publicly responded to the research findings, leaving the AI community and policymakers

Beijing Narrative Control on FusePop