13:I[2754,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 14:I[8387,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 16:I[2972,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],""] 15:T7db,

OpenAI Fires Back at Elon Musk's Lawsuit

In a decisive response to Elon Musk's lawsuit, OpenAI has strongly defended its mission and corporate structure, dismissing claims that it betrayed its original nonprofit principles. The AI research company, known for developing ChatGPT, filed a detailed response on March 5, 2024, addressing allegations made by its former board member and early supporter.

OpenAI's response reveals previously undisclosed details about Musk's involvement with the company, including his alleged attempt to merge OpenAI with Tesla in 2018 and his suggestion to take full control of the organization. The company argues that Musk's lawsuit is motivated by regret over his decision to step away from OpenAI in 2018 after his proposals were rejected.

Key points in OpenAI's defense include:

Documentation showing Musk supported the company's transition to a 'capped-profit' model before his departure
Evidence that Musk understood and endorsed the potential need for significant capital to achieve OpenAI's mission
Claims that Musk's own actions contradicted his current position about AI development being solely for public benefit

The legal battle highlights the complex relationship between profit and public benefit in AI development. OpenAI maintains that its current structure, including the formation of a for-profit entity under a nonprofit parent organization, is essential for securing the resources needed to develop safe and beneficial AI while maintaining its commitment to humanity's benefit.

This dispute represents a

Corporate Structure Dispute on FusePop