13:I[2754,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 14:I[8387,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 16:I[2972,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],""] 15:T65c,

Columbia Professor Says She Was Forced to Retire Because of Activism

Katherine Franke, a prominent law professor at Columbia University, has alleged that she was effectively forced into retirement as a direct consequence of her political activism surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict.

Franke, who has been a vocal critic of Israel's actions in Gaza, claims that her outspoken stance led to professional retaliation. In a recent statement, she suggested that her academic career was jeopardized due to her public support for Palestinian rights and criticism of Israeli military policies.

Key points of her allegations include:

Experiencing professional marginalization after expressing pro-Palestinian views
Feeling pressured to retire despite her distinguished academic record
Believing her activism triggered institutional backlash

The situation highlights ongoing tensions within academic institutions regarding free speech, political expression, and the boundaries of scholarly discourse. Franke's case has sparked broader discussions about academic freedom and the potential consequences of taking controversial political positions.

While Columbia University has not publicly commented on Franke's specific claims, the incident underscores the complex challenges faced by academics who engage in politically sensitive debates.

As conversations about institutional neutrality and professional autonomy continue, Franke's experience serves as a significant case study in the intersection of academic work and political activism.

Faculty Investigation on FusePop