13:I[2754,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 14:I[8387,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 16:I[2972,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],""] 15:T687,

Google Faces Potential Chrome Breakup in Landmark Antitrust Move

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed a groundbreaking antitrust intervention that could force Google to divest its Chrome browser, signaling an unprecedented challenge to the tech giant's market dominance.

The proposed action stems from long-standing concerns about Google's overwhelming control of internet search and digital advertising markets. With Chrome representing approximately 65% of global browser market share, the DOJ argues that the browser gives Google an unfair competitive advantage.

Chrome's market share exceeds competitors like Safari (19%) and Firefox (3%)
Google's search engine controls over 90% of global search traffic
The proposed intervention could fundamentally restructure digital search ecosystems

Legal experts suggest this move represents one of the most aggressive antitrust actions against a technology company in recent decades. By potentially forcing Chrome's separation, regulators aim to create a more competitive digital marketplace that allows smaller tech companies more opportunities for innovation.

Google has consistently defended its practices, arguing that Chrome provides users with a seamless, integrated browsing experience. However, the DOJ contends that this integration stifles competition and limits consumer choice.

If implemented, this intervention could trigger significant changes in how users interact with internet search and browsing technologies, potentially opening doors for alternative browser and

Google Chrome Monopoly on FusePop