13:I[2754,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 14:I[8387,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],"default",1] 16:I[2972,["2972","static/chunks/2972-6f5d56019c5c6a42.js","3868","static/chunks/app/tags/%5Bid%5D/page-e0de42c5bec059fc.js"],""] 15:T677,

Instagram Co-Founder Says Startup Was Denied Resources at Meta Trial

In a pivotal moment during the ongoing antitrust trial against Meta, Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom provided compelling testimony about the challenges his startup faced after being acquired by Facebook (now Meta) in 2012.

Systrom's testimony revealed a complex narrative of corporate resource allocation, suggesting that Instagram was strategically limited in its growth potential. He argued that despite the platform's rapid user expansion, Meta's leadership was hesitant to provide full technological and developmental support.

Key revelations from Systrom's testimony include:

Limited engineering resources allocated to Instagram's development
Restricted access to Facebook's broader technological infrastructure
Potential deliberate suppression of Instagram's independent innovation potential

The trial, which centers on Meta's acquisition strategies and potential monopolistic practices, represents a significant moment in tech industry regulation. Systrom's insights provide rare internal perspective on how large tech companies manage emerging competitive platforms.

While Meta has consistently denied allegations of anti-competitive behavior, Systrom's testimony adds substantial weight to arguments that the company systematically neutralized potential competitors through strategic resource management.

As the trial continues, Systrom's revelations could have far-reaching implications for how tech giants approach startup acquisitions and platform development in th

Resource Suppression on FusePop